MLB real data
MLB moneyline board.
Moneyline predictions run on our live MLB model. Run-line and total models are shown as projection context while edge and EV remain disabled.
Top Picks Today
Strongest current spots
Market implies 65.9% on CLE vs model 61.3%; I side with the market here given Messick's 2.59 ERA and 1.03 WHIP over 142 IP against a SFG offense at...
Market's 65.7% on TBR looks better calibrated than the model's 57%; Rasmussen (2.78 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 9.26 K/9) against Scherzer (6.59 ERA, 1.46 WHIP...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Both starters are TBD with fallback stats, so the 2.83 vs 3.91 ERA gap is not attributable to actual pitchers. No market odds available, so no anch...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
AI Analyst Today
Ranked MLB analyst slate
Market's 65.7% on TBR looks better calibrated than the model's 57%; Rasmussen (2.78 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 9.26 K/9) against Scherzer (6.59 ERA, 1.46 WHIP in 41 IP) is a clea...
Model takes NYM despite worse record (57-70 vs 68-59), lower RPG (3.9 vs 4.7) and a far weaker starter: Stock's 6.57 ERA and 1.86 WHIP over 12.3 IP vs King's 3.41 ERA,...
Model's 51.6% on COL sits 16 points above the market's 35.6% implied, and the underlying inputs don't support it: Colorado is 50-76 with a .531 OPS and Freeland carrie...
Market implies 65.9% on CLE vs model 61.3%; I side with the market here given Messick's 2.59 ERA and 1.03 WHIP over 142 IP against a SFG offense at 3.1 RPG. Wilkinson...
Market has CIN at 57.9% while the model gives STL 54.4% — a large gap, and the pitching matchup favors the market: Burns at 2.47 ERA, 10.37 K/9, 1.09 WHIP versus Liber...
Taking the other side of both model and market: WSN owns the better starter (Cavalli 3.36 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 9.94 K/9 vs Rocker 4.50/1.40) and a far better offense (.820...
Near pick'em: model 51.4% MIN vs market 48.4%, no real comparison either way. ATL's 74-52 record and .789 OPS outrank MIN's 62-65 and .673, so I take the small side ag...
Both starters are TBD with fallback stats, so the 2.83 vs 3.91 ERA gap is not attributable to actual pitchers. No market odds available, so no anchor for the model's 5...
MLB Board
Moneyline predictions with pitcher, projection, and market context
Market implies 65.9% on CLE vs model 61.3%; I side with the market here given Messick's 2.59 ERA and 1.03 WHIP over 142 IP against a SFG offense at...
Market's 65.7% on TBR looks better calibrated than the model's 57%; Rasmussen (2.78 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 9.26 K/9) against Scherzer (6.59 ERA, 1.46 WHIP...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Both starters are TBD with fallback stats, so the 2.83 vs 3.91 ERA gap is not attributable to actual pitchers. No market odds available, so no anch...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Market has CIN at 57.9% while the model gives STL 54.4% — a large gap, and the pitching matchup favors the market: Burns at 2.47 ERA, 10.37 K/9, 1....
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model takes NYM despite worse record (57-70 vs 68-59), lower RPG (3.9 vs 4.7) and a far weaker starter: Stock's 6.57 ERA and 1.86 WHIP over 12.3 IP...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model's 51.6% on COL sits 16 points above the market's 35.6% implied, and the underlying inputs don't support it: Colorado is 50-76 with a .531 OPS...
Near pick'em: model 51.4% MIN vs market 48.4%, no real comparison either way. ATL's 74-52 record and .789 OPS outrank MIN's 62-65 and .673, so I ta...
Taking the other side of both model and market: WSN owns the better starter (Cavalli 3.36 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 9.94 K/9 vs Rocker 4.50/1.40) and a far b...