Top Picks
Ranked picks with source labels.
NHL, MLB, Soccer, and NFL entries are live when their real feeds are enabled. Any remaining fixture-backed cards are clearly labelled.
Top Picks
Strongest current predictions
Market implies 65.9% on CLE vs model 61.3%; I side with the market here given Messick's 2.59 ERA and 1.03 WHIP over 142 IP against a SFG offense at...
Market's 65.7% on TBR looks better calibrated than the model's 57%; Rasmussen (2.78 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, 9.26 K/9) against Scherzer (6.59 ERA, 1.46 WHIP...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Both starters are TBD with fallback stats, so the 2.83 vs 3.91 ERA gap is not attributable to actual pitchers. No market odds available, so no anch...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Market has CIN at 57.9% while the model gives STL 54.4% — a large gap, and the pitching matchup favors the market: Burns at 2.47 ERA, 10.37 K/9, 1....
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model takes NYM despite worse record (57-70 vs 68-59), lower RPG (3.9 vs 4.7) and a far weaker starter: Stock's 6.57 ERA and 1.86 WHIP over 12.3 IP...
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model pick shown; AI Analyst note unavailable for this matchup.
Model's 51.6% on COL sits 16 points above the market's 35.6% implied, and the underlying inputs don't support it: Colorado is 50-76 with a .531 OPS...
Near pick'em: model 51.4% MIN vs market 48.4%, no real comparison either way. ATL's 74-52 record and .789 OPS outrank MIN's 62-65 and .673, so I ta...
Taking the other side of both model and market: WSN owns the better starter (Cavalli 3.36 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 9.94 K/9 vs Rocker 4.50/1.40) and a far b...